Most teams have shipped faster than engineering best practices can follow. Before you scale, onboard engineers, or enter due diligence, you need a systematic technical code audit and a prioritized plan to fix what is there.
Trusted by engineering teams across 15+ countries
From startups to Fortune 500 companies
Common Challenges
A codebase that works today is not the same as a codebase that is secure, maintainable, and ready to scale.
Sound familiar? These are the exact problems we were built to solve
No one can say with confidence what the codebase contains, or where the security exposure is
Security vulnerabilities are found by users or auditors, not your team. Fixing them after the fact costs far more.
No test coverage means every deployment carries risk. A change in one place breaks something unrelated.
Technical debt you cannot quantify makes it impossible to estimate features, plan sprints, or give a credible roadmap to investors.
Service Overview
WHY CHOOSE US
No ramp-up waiting. Your dedicated team is scoped, staffed, and running within a month, not a quarter.
You work directly with the engineers building your product, not through account managers. Slack, standups, code reviews: your way.
We don't ship prototypes. Every build includes guardrails, monitoring, rollback plans, and SLA agreements before it touches real users.
Our engineers pass a rigorous multi-stage vetting process. They have shipped production systems before.
IS THIS RIGHT FOR YOU?
Your product has grown faster than the design holding it together
Users are dropping off and you do not know why
Your developers are losing time to design ambiguity
WHAT'S INCLUDED
Where your codebase creates exposure.
What is there and what it will cost you later
The layer most fast-shipped codebases skip entirely
We fix what we find, not just report it
OUR PROCESs
From Codebase Access to a System You Can Trust
THE TEAM
Every engagement is staffed with named senior engineers. Security, architecture, and infrastructure are separate roles, not one generalist doing all three.
InApps Engineering Team
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Auth, dependencies, secrets, input validation, OWASP
CI/CD, deployment, database, environment, observability
Architecture, code quality, antipatterns, maintainability
Findings report, remediation roadmap, client walkthrough
HIRING PROCESS
Every engineer passes rigorous stages before we let them near client work.
Real-world design challenge with brief and constraints, Portfolio review across product and UX work, Design rationale and decision walkthrough
Technical communication, Client-facing scenario, Written & spoken English
Agile mindset & teamwork, Ownership & accountability, Adaptability & growth mindset
Technical panel interview, Reference & background check, Culture & values alignment
WHY INAPPS
TESTIMONIALS
“We expected mid-level engineers. We got seniors who came in, assessed the codebase, and proposed better solutions before we even asked. That's a different category of partner.”
“"Great website/UX design capabilities. A great experience designing the front end of our website, responsive team, and good end product."”
“I really don't look at it as I'm dealing with vendors, but a partner. InApps satisfied our requirements, we expected our company to be: culture, communication, skillsets, and dedication”
Case Studies
Prudential needed engineering scale across multiple markets, but couldn't absorb the overhead of local recruitment in a regulated environment. InApp has built a compliant, multi-squad offshore engineering center for one of SEA's largest insurance groups, enabling faster product delivery without the cost and risk of direct hiring.
Common Questions
This is the most common assumption that leads to failed redesigns. Knowing your users from support tickets and internal feedback is not the same as observing them navigate your product without help. User research surfaces the gap between what users say they do and what they actually do. We recommend at minimum 5 moderated usability sessions before any significant redesign. If your timeline or budget does not allow for full research, we scope a lean discovery sprint that gives you enough signal to design with confidence.
Describe the design problem. We will come back with a research-grounded approach and scoped proposal within 48 hours. One call. No commitment.
