- Home
- >
- Software Development
- >
- Tracking the Source Collaboration Market – InApps 2025
Tracking the Source Collaboration Market – InApps is an article under the topic Software Development Many of you are most interested in today !! Today, let’s InApps.net learn Tracking the Source Collaboration Market – InApps in today’s post !
Key Summary
- Overview: The source collaboration market, encompassing version control systems (VCS) and source code management (SCM) tools, is dominated by platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. The document analyzes market trends based on studies from SmartBear and JetBrains, addressing GitLab CEO Sid Sijbrandij’s query about growth dynamics.
- Market Trends:
- Git Dominance: Git is nearly universal, used by 84% of developers for source collaboration, per JetBrains’ State of the Developer Ecosystem.
- Platform Shifts:
- GitHub: Stable usage, with minimal change in adoption.
- GitLab: Grew from 33% to 38% as a VCS, likely gaining at Bitbucket’s expense.
- Bitbucket: Dropped from 41% to 32% in regular use.
- SmartBear Study: Reported a 74% Git usage rate in 2019 (up from 55% in 2018), but this 35% increase is questioned due to a sample bias toward smaller companies (100 or fewer employees, rising from 31% to 44% of respondents).
- GitLab Growth: Likely driven by internal project management and its full DevOps suite, though it’s unclear if growth comes from paid or free users.
- Challenges in Data Interpretation:
- Inconsistent definitions across studies (e.g., SCM vs. VCS) complicate comparisons.
- G2’s categorization includes peer code review, static code analysis, version control clients, hosting, and systems, highlighting the need for standardized terminology.
- Conclusion: GitLab’s growth in the source collaboration market may reflect its appeal for internal projects and comprehensive offerings, while Bitbucket loses ground. The overstated Git growth in SmartBear’s study underscores the importance of consistent metrics. InApps suggests stakeholders align on definitions to better track market trends.
Read more about Tracking the Source Collaboration Market – InApps at Wikipedia
You can find content about Tracking the Source Collaboration Market – InApps from the Wikipedia website
After reading our post on vulnerability scanning services, GitLab CEO Sid Sijbrandij asked us, “So GitHub is growing, GitLab is growing even faster, and GitLab and BitBucket are shrinking? …. What could explain that?” He wanted to know why SmartBear’s study found that companies are increasingly paying to use one of these code repositories, but our study only saw an increase for GitHub. Here is our explanation.
Public-facing open source projects may be just the tip of an iceberg; much of GitLab’s growth may be related to the management of internal projects and its full suite of offerings. Furthermore, the drop from 30% to 27% was relatively small and did not distinguish between which non-GitHub companies are being used. Luckily, JetBrains’ State of the Developer Ecosystem reports provide more detail. This study asked about the adoption of “source code collaboration tools” and “version control systems”, and then looked at which specific “version control services” are used. At least in this study, Git was almost universally used to some extent, with a source collaboration tool being used 84% of the time. GitHub barely changed, GitLab rose from 33% to 38%, and Bitbucket dropped from 41% to 32% as a version control service used regularly. GitLab appears to be gaining at Bitbucket’s expense, but the JetBrains data does not tell us if this is coming from paying customers versus users of its free version.
When comparing the multiple studies, we believe SmartBear’s findings likely overstated the degree to which Git usage grew. Its 2019 study reported that 74% of companies used Git for software configuration management (SCM), up from 55% in 2018. The question choices align with what is also commonly known as source code management. Although it is obvious that Git has become the predominant version control system, we are skeptical that it saw a 35% yearly increase. Digging into the SmartBear sample, we found that its latest survey saw a jump in respondents from companies with 100 or fewer employees, going from 31% in 2018 to 44% in 2019.
Everyone would benefit if vendors and analysts could agree on common definitions for technologies and markets. For example, peer review site G2 has five different components to its source code management category: 1) peer code review, 2) static code analysis, 3) version control clients, 4) version control hosting, and 5) version control systems. In the meantime, let us know what buckets you place these products in.
Recent Relevant Research
Feature image via Pixabay.
Source: InApps.net
Let’s create the next big thing together!
Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.
