• Home
  • >
  • Offshore News
  • >
  • Staff Augmentation vs Consulting: Which Fits Your Project Best?

Are you considering expanding your team? Do you hire new permanent employees, or is outsourcing to remote developers through staff augmentation faster and cheaper? Perhaps your project requires a broad range of specialist skills. In that case, consulting might be the better approach.

Deciding between staff augmentation and consulting depends on multiple factors. These include the skills of your existing team, current skill shortages, and your project’s unique requirements. Your business goals, both short and long-term, and your budget also play crucial roles.

This article explores the differences between staff augmentation vs consulting. Understanding each approach’s pros and cons will help you make an informed hiring decision. With the right choice, you can streamline the process and achieve satisfactory outcomes.

1. What is staff augmentation?

IT staff augmentation is an outsourcing model used in software development where companies temporarily hire external professionals. Instead of hiring new full-time employees, a company can use staff augmentation to hire people for short-term projects or to fill gaps in their team’s skills. This approach allows companies to adjust the size and expertise of their workforce.

For example, if a company is working on a new app but lacks developers skilled in a specific programming language, they could use staff augmentation to hire a developer with that expertise. Once the project is complete, or the need for that skill subsides, the augmented staff can be released without long-term employment.

This method is particularly useful for managing project costs and meeting deadlines, as it allows businesses to rapidly scale resources. By using staff augmentation, companies can focus on their projects without expanding their permanent workforce unnecessarily. This helps keep projects agile and responsive to changes in scope or technology.


Advantages of IT Staff Augmentation

Disadvantages of IT Staff Augmentation

  • It is ideal for companies that need to quickly scale their in-house team with more or new skill sets.
  • More cost-effective than hiring a project-based consulting agency.
  • Less commitment and risk than hiring new permanent in-house employees.
  • There is no need to spend resources or time on training for staff augmentation – they already have the specialist or generalist skills ready to go.
  • Augmented staff works alongside your existing workflow, not drastically changing it.
  • It can be hard to integrate augmented staff into your in-house team.
  • Augmented staff might not share your company’s long-term goals.
  • A wide variety of cost and skillset differences between staff augmentation makes it hard to pick out the best developers.
  • The in-house team may not cooperate well with augmented staff.
Read More:   Where should Top Coders work in 2022?

2. What is consulting?

Project-based consulting agencies offer a variety of services. These include conceptualizing, planning, staffing, managing projects, and providing post-launch support all under one roof. Consulting is suitable for businesses needing help to set up project guidelines, identify necessary skills, and gather required resources. These agencies play a crucial role in defining a project’s scope and vision, which contrasts with staff augmentation. Staff augmentation typically joins projects with predefined parameters.

Consulting agencies provide ongoing supervision and feedback. They adapt well organizationally, but often follow set service packages and delivery methods, despite some flexibility.These agencies may handle multiple clients simultaneously, which can delay direct support and feedback for your project. They might prioritize other projects ahead of yours.

Performance can vary between agencies. Some are more capable of providing consistent, effective support and overcoming client management challenges.


Advantages of Consulting

Disadvantages of Consulting

  • A more comprehensive range of specialist and generalist skills through one convenient provider
  • Able to assist with the planning, conceptualization, and execution of a project from start to end.
  • Consulting services help take the burden off your existing in-house team so that you can focus on what you do best
  • Consulting services typically employ experienced project managers who will ensure the delivery of your project
  • Typically, more expensive than staff augmentation due to their broader range of skills and capabilities.
  • Since consulting services often serve multiple clients at once, they may not be as readily available as you like.
  • Most consulting services have a very fixed way of providing the services they offer, so their one-size-fits-all approach may not work for you.

3. Comparing Staff Augmentation vs Consulting

3.1 Costs Of Staff Augmentation vs Consulting

When considering costs, staff augmentation is a more budget-friendly option. It’s tailored for short-term needs and avoids the long-term commitments associated with full-time hires. Consulting, while often pricier, involves comprehensive, end-to-end management of projects. It addresses immediate needs and offer strategic insights that help shape a business’s long-term goals. Tech consultants develop customized solutions tailored specifically to a client’s unique challenges.

Read More:   What are the drawbacks of Agile methodology and how to fix them?

3.2 Flexibility of Staff Augmentation vs Consulting

Flexibility is another key factor in choosing between staff augmentation and consulting. Staff augmentation allows you to adjust your team size quickly and efficiently. This model is ideal for projects with shifting requirements. In contrast, consulting offers structured solutions but tends to be less adaptable to rapid changes without formal renegotiations.

For example, imagine you hire a consulting firm to develop a new software system and later decide to add more features. Implementing these changes through a consulting firm requires renegotiating terms and adjusting the project plan, which can slow down progress.

In contrast, using staff augmentation, you can quickly bring in specific experts to adapt to new needs. This method allows for immediate changes under your current management, keeping the project flexible and on track without the need for formal renegotiations.

3.3 Management and Control

In terms of management, staff augmentation keeps control within your in-house team, integrating external talent directly under your established protocols. Consulting teams, however, often have independent processes and management styles, which can reduce your direct oversight but bring new efficiencies.

3.4 Project Duration

Consulting usually takes more time than staff augmentation. This is because consulting involves planning and managing the whole project from beginning to end. It includes not just doing the work but also giving advice and making sure everything runs smoothly for a long time.

For instance, if a company wants to overhaul its computer system, a consulting firm would help plan the project, manage every step, and ensure the new system works well even after they leave. This process is thorough and takes time. On the other hand, staff augmentation is quicker. This approach is about hiring extra help for specific tasks or for a short time. If the same company needs extra programmers to meet a deadline, they can bring them on quickly just for that period. This helps the company finish tasks faster without long-term commitments.

In summary, project duration also varies; staff augmentation adapts well to quick, specific tasks. Consulting is better for longer engagements, offering deep strategic guidance from start to finish.

Read More:   Offshore Software Development Rates by Country 2024

4. How to choose between staff augmentation vs project-based consulting

Which options between staff augmentation vs consulting are suitable for you depending on your unique requirements.


4.1 Assessing Project Needs

Begin by evaluating the scope and complexity of your project. IT staff augmentation is ideal for smaller projects where you need temporary staff with specific skills. This method allows you to quickly scale your workforce to meet project demands without long-term commitments. On the other hand, consulting services are more suitable for larger projects requiring a mix of specialized and general skills. Consulting can provide comprehensive planning and project management, which is crucial for complex initiatives.

4.2 Budget Considerations

Next, consider your budget. Staff augmentation typically involves a higher hourly rate but saves on long-term employee benefits, potentially lowering overall costs for short-term needs. In contrast, project-based consulting might come with higher upfront costs but includes a range of services that can be more cost-effective for extensive projects. Weigh the costs of both options against the expected outcomes to determine which provides better value for your investment.

4.3 Cultural Fit and Team Dynamics

It’s also important to consider your company culture and how your team will interact with new members. Will your in-house team welcome augmented staff? To ensure smooth integration and collaboration, it’s beneficial to involve your team in the selection process. This helps in choosing augmented staff who not only meet the project’s technical requirements but are also a good cultural fit.

4.4 Gathering Team Input

Encourage your in-house team to share their thoughts and opinions about bringing in augmented staff. This inclusion can ease any concerns they might have and fosters a collaborative environment. By choosing staff who are likely to mesh well with your existing team, you reduce the risk of conflict and increase the likelihood of project success.

This structured approach helps you systematically address the major considerations in choosing between staff augmentation and consulting, so you’ll make the best decision for your specific needs.

5. Wrapping Up

Hopefully, this article’s helped you better understand staff augmentation vs consulting and their unique advantages and disadvantages

There is much competition out there, so it’s wise to do your research and compare your options before making the final choice. This way, you will most likely find the right team for you (at the best price) and receive an outcome that satisfies all parties involved.

InApps assists companies worldwide in combating talent shortages by recruiting and retaining talented software engineers in Vietnam who work as an integral part of the client’s product development team. Our skilled and experienced teams can work on any software development project that you might need, as proven by their high customer retention rate. Browse our website, or fill out the contact form to let us know what skills you’re looking for.


5/5 - (19 votes)
I am a dynamic Tech Explorer and Writer for InApps Technology. With a background in software engineering and a knack for writing, my content brings a fresh and insightful perspective to the tech scene. I love making their content not just informative but also incredibly engaging for both tech novices and aficionados. Join me on a journey through the ever-evolving digital landscape, where I decode complex concepts into captivating stories.

Let’s create the next big thing together!

Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.

Let’s talk

Get a custom Proposal

Please fill in your information and your need to get a suitable solution.

    You need to enter your email to download


      Success. Downloading...